Organizational boundaries
Separate tenants, applications, identities, and evidence.
Coordinate identity across complex organizations and deployment boundaries.
Apply common tenant, policy, approval, and evidence semantics while supporting managed, hybrid, and customer-hosted enforcement.
- Organizational boundaries
- Progressive strength
- Customer-boundary enforcement
What you can evaluate
Enterprise control without implicit trust.
Progressive strength
Increase authentication requirements with consequence.
Customer-boundary enforcement
Evaluate protected workflows where policy requires.
Operational evidence
Connect identity state to access and action outcomes.
Follow Enterprise identity from identity to evidence.
Each consequential action moves through the same six control points. See where 2AYE evaluates authority, requests human review, and preserves the outcome.
- 01IdentityWho or what is acting
- 02IntentSigned purpose and limits
- 03PolicyDeterministic evaluation
- 04ApprovalA named human when required
- 05ExecutionSingle-use grant, redeemed at the resource
- 06EvidenceReceipt joined to the audit chain
A practical adoption path
Start with one consequential workflow. Prove the boundary before expanding.
Assess
Document the environment, threat model, and integration boundary.
Design
Select protocols, signals, policies, and failure behavior.
Validate
Test vendor-specific APIs, tenant isolation, and abuse paths.
Release
Mark available only after deployed end-to-end verification.
What this includes
- Evidence package export: a portable, self-verifying file of the chain, contracts, grants, receipts and signing keys
- Tenant isolation
- Authentication policy that rises with consequence
- Hash-linked evidence