Control mapping
Relate technical controls to named customer requirements.
Produce reviewable control evidence without claiming automatic compliance.
Map identity, access, approval, revocation, retention, and audit capabilities to customer obligations. Certification and legal conclusions require independent validation.
- Control mapping
- Separation of duties
- Evidence retention
What you can evaluate
Evidence-ready architecture.
Separation of duties
Require additional approval for defined consequential operations.
Evidence retention
Preserve decision and execution context according to policy.
Honest status
Distinguish architecture alignment from certification.
Follow Compliance solutions from identity to evidence.
Each consequential action moves through the same six control points. See where 2AYE evaluates authority, requests human review, and preserves the outcome.
- 01IdentityWho or what is acting
- 02IntentSigned purpose and limits
- 03PolicyDeterministic evaluation
- 04ApprovalA named human when required
- 05ExecutionSingle-use grant, redeemed at the resource
- 06EvidenceReceipt joined to the audit chain
A practical adoption path
Start with one consequential workflow. Prove the boundary before expanding.
Assess
Document the environment, threat model, and integration boundary.
Design
Select protocols, signals, policies, and failure behavior.
Validate
Test vendor-specific APIs, tenant isolation, and abuse paths.
Release
Mark available only after deployed end-to-end verification.